Search for: "Paz v. Doe" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2013, 12:32 pm
Well, we all missed a Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decision -- quite a big one and an unusual one too -- Case C‑661/11, Martin Y Paz Diffusion SA v David Depuydt, Fabriek van Maroquinerie Gauquie NV, a ruling of the Third Chamber of Europe's favourite court that dates all the way back to 19 September. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:18 pm
.The CCA granted discretionary review without oral argument (on petition by the State) in the following cases:Mark De La Paz v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:07 pm
Contents include:Editorial JHHW, On My Way Out – Advice to Young Scholars V: Writing References; In this IssueArticlesNiels Petersen, The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Politics of Identifying Customary International Law Bernard Hoekman & Petros C. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am by Eric Goldman
July 20, 2019) Some Related Posts (from 2019): Another Blocked Facebook User Loses in Court–Dipp-Paz v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:26 am
With Spring Training well underway, we took notice of the solid base hit delivered last month by the Northern District of California in La Paz v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
Cir. 1984), which awarded children surviving a plane crash medical monitoring to diagnose future impact-related injuries, and the state’s Doe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:39 am
Pending Cases Of Decolonization Paz Andrés Sáenz De Santa María, A Right Of All Peoples: The Internal Dimension of Self-Determination and Its Relationship With Democracy Javier Roldán Barbero, Internal Democracy And International Law Xavier Pons Rafols, The Right to Political Participation in International Law, Independence Referendums, and International Good Practice Esperanza Orihuela Calatayud, Does a Right of Remedial Secession Exist Under… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:27 am by Sean Wajert
American Brands, Inc., 16 P.3d 435 (Nev. 2001); Paz v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by José Carlos Laguna de Paz
A judge can strike down a regulation if it does not align with the purpose of the statute––one could argue this might have really been the case in Chevron v. [read post]